首页> 外文OA文献 >Direct Vocabulary Instruction in Kindergarten: Teaching for Breadth versus Depth
【2h】

Direct Vocabulary Instruction in Kindergarten: Teaching for Breadth versus Depth

机译:幼儿园直接词汇教学:广度与深度教学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare 2 methods for directly teaching word meanings to kindergarten students within storybook readalouds that varied in instructional time and depth of instruction along with a control condition that provided students with incidental exposure to target words. Embedded instruction introduces target word meanings during storybook readings in a time-efficient manner. Extended instruction is more time intensive but provides multiple opportunities to interact with target words outside the context of the story. Participants included 42 kindergarten students who were taught 9 target words, 3 with each method. Target words were counterbalanced in a within-subjects design. Findings indicated that extended instruction resulted in more full and refined word knowledge, while embedded instruction resulted in partial knowledge of target vocabulary. Implications are discussed in relation to the strengths and limitations of different approaches to direct vocabulary instruction in kindergarten and the trade-offs between instruction that focuses on teaching for breadth versus depth.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较两种直接向故事书阅读中的幼儿园学生教授单词含义的方法,这些方法因教学时间和教学深度的不同以及控制条件使学生偶然接触目标单词而有所不同。嵌入式教学在故事书阅读过程中以省时的方式介绍了目标词的含义。扩展教学需要更多时间,但是提供了与故事上下文之外的目标单词进行交互的多种机会。参与者包括42名幼儿园学生,他们被教授9个目标词,每种方法3个。目标词在对象内部设计中得到抵消。研究结果表明,扩展的教学可以带来更全面和完善的单词知识,而嵌入式教学则可以使目标词汇获得部分知识。讨论了有关幼儿园直接词汇教学的不同方法的优势和局限性,以及侧重于广度与深度的教学之间的权衡取舍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号